FULL TEXT
IMAGES
APSP J Case Rep 2011; Vol. 2 (2)
OPEN
ACCESS
Congenital Midline Cervical
Skin Bridge
Bilal Mirza,* Afzal sheikh
Department of Paediatric Surgery, The Children's
Hospital & The Institute of Child Health Lahore, Pakistan
*Corresponding Author's E-mail address:
blmirza@yahoo.com
APSP J Case Rep 2011; 2: 20
How to cite
Mirza B, Sheikh A.
Congenital midline cervical skin bridge. APSP J Case Rep
2011;2:20.
A
6-month-old male infant presented in outpatient department with a congenital
skin bridge in midline of the neck region. The bridge was causing difficulty in
neck movements. On clinical examination the infant was healthy with a 1x4 cm
skin bridge extending from the cervical region at the level of hyoid bone to the
suprasternal notch, in the midline (Fig. 1,2). There were no other problems. The
skin bridge was excised by making elliptical incisions on either sides of the
bridge. The skin beneath the excised skin bridge was slightly thick as compared
to the surrounding area (Fig. 3). The thickened skin became normal at 2 months
follow-up. Histopathology of the tissue revealed as normal skin and subcutaneous
tissue.
Website developed by Bilal Mirza
IMAGES
DISCUSSION
Congenital midline cervical skin bridge is
an extremely rare entity. It is a benign lesion composed mainly of skin. No
major structures like arteries veins or nerves passes through it [1]. Its blood
supply can be speculated to come from the skin of suprasternal notch as while
excision a small subcutaneous vessel was secured with the suture.
Only
one case has been reported in 2008 by Kawar et al. The etiology of congenital
midline cervical skin bridge, as suggested by Kawar et al, is failure of
resorption of skin and subcutaneous tissue at the time of fusion of neck tissues
in the midline or epithelialization of an amniotic band [1]. We believe that
occurrence of this anomaly is not a chance fusion of skin as in amniotic bands
but results due to specific underlying phenomenon like many other congenital
anomalies.
Restriction of neck extension and cosmetic problems are the
main indications of the surgery. The case of Kawar et al presented at 3 months
age whereas our patient presented at 6 months age. We believe that on account of
delayed presentation the skin beneath the bridge became slightly thickened due
to failure of neck extension (natural tendency of tissues). After excision of
the bridge the skin became normal in texture.
REFERENCES
1.
Kawar B, Siplovich L. Congenital midline cervical skin bridge a case report. J
Pediatr Surg 2008;43:544-5.