FULL TEXT
EDITORIAL
APSP J Case Rep 2010; Vol. 1 (2)
OPEN ACCESS
Postgraduate
Training Program in Pediatric Surgery: A Way Forward
Jamshed
Akhtar
Nationa Institute of
Child Health Karachi, Pakistan
Corresponding Author's E-mail address:
jamjim88@yahoo.com
APSP J Case Rep
2011; 2: 1
Postgraduate training is a dynamic activity. Over the years it is
undergoing increasing standardization. In the past programs have been haphazard
and inconsistent but now structured curriculum are in place. Comprehensive
details related to criteria of entry, duration of training, core knowledge
areas, and competencies required can be found. How program is to be run is
explicitly chalked down and log books developed to be completed by trainees. In
Pakistan one such model is implemented by College of Physicians & Surgeons
Pakistan (CPSP). The program was developed through a well organized activity
with explicit guidelines, under supervision of medical educationists, who
initially trained program directors through various educational workshops. Few
medical universities have also developed curriculum related to pediatric surgery
but how they are developed is not known. While CPSP training program is uniform
throughout the country, university program varies. There is also a comprehensive
evaluation system with CPSP program and evaluation strategies are accessible to
both trainees and trainers and evaluators.
The magic figure of three
years of residency in pediatric surgery (after completing two years in general
surgery with evaluation exam) in CPSP model is questioned by few program
directors. In United States the total duration of training in pediatric surgery
after general surgery residency, is two years. The 18 months training comprise
of clinical pediatric surgery and the remaining six months may be spent in
related clinical disciplines to enhance the educational experience, or get
involved in scholarly activities. It raises question as to how general surgery
residency in US model is beneficial to those seeking career in pediatric
surgery. In this model the pediatric surgery resident spends only 25% of his
total training in core curriculum of his own discipline. During this time period
it is expected that trainee must document a total of 800 major pediatric surgery
procedures as surgeon and the service providing training must cater for at least
1200 core surgical procedures per year. It is for pediatric surgeons to ponder
for unique requirements for patient population and trainees [1,2].
Accreditation of the services for training in pediatric surgery is
another painstaking assignment. An elaborate form has been developed by CPSP to
be filled in by the program directors providing details of workload, facilities
offered, number and expertise of teaching faculty etc. It is an observation that
departments of pediatric surgery in the country are heterogeneous thus training
imparted may not be uniform. Some services may get recognition even when
facilities like ICU care, minimally invasive surgery etc are not optimal. Thus
need of rotation to other centers where such exposure is guaranteed, must be
looked into.
The two important areas not addressed
with CPSP model are, compliance with the residency program, periodic evaluation
and need of changes that may be required in this era of rapid technological
advancement with new evidence based data related to diseases. No study has been
conducted by pediatric surgeons in this regard to objectively address the issue.
The Association of Paediatric Surgeons of Pakistan may gather a
multi-institutional data to get some inference and suggest changes, if deemed
necessary.
Another important issue is evaluation of trainees. In United
States continuous periodic assessment is made and feedback given while in
contemporary evaluation system with CPSP only end exam is the deciding point
though residents do complete log books of their training and write dissertation
or a scientific paper but these are not counted in the final examination. The
training institutes thus play a passive role and may feel isolated. The input
from supervisors must be acknowledged at some level for which integrity of
trainers themselves is an issue. The role of trainers in residency program must
be assessed periodically by respective institutes and monitoring body. In
addition residents should be asked to write an annual confidential report of
their supervisors. This two way accountability and evaluation helps in raising
the standard of training program and evaluation of both trainees and
trainers.
A residency program in pediatric surgery intends
to impart advance knowledge coupled with hands on training to aspiring young
doctors caring for children. An optimal program thus aims at producing safe
surgeons, competent enough to take care of pediatric surgical patients referred
to them.
REFERENCES
1. ACGME Program
requirements for graduate medical education in pediatric surgery. Available at
URL
https://www.acgme.org/acWebsite/downloads/RRC_progReq/445_pediatric_surgery_07012007_u08102008.pdf
accessed on 28th February 2011.
2. Pediatric Surgery Training
Programs. Available at URL
http://www.cincinnatichildrens.org/svc/alpha/g/surgery/training/ped-surgery.htm
accessed on 28th February 2011.
Website developed by Bilal Mirza